What is the direction of DDD

jose maria gomez <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.debugging.ddd.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I think we should work in the code in order to:

- Decouple GUI from code. (Peter have done a lot in this aspect)
- To use C++ in order to make the code easy to understand and to maintain. 
More than the language I mean the design. One of my main goals is to have a 
good enviroment in order to make the things easier to other people to help. 
To get it, I would like to make a good object oriented designed software to 
insolate components. In this way we could work in different parts of the code 
in a better way, and in a cleaner way.
- On my point of view, motif is not easy to make big and functional 
applications. As you know I was thinking to use Qt but GNU project prefer 
Gtk. I know that there is one guy working in a branch with gtkmm. So I think 
is a good oportunity to have a common core and two branches with different 
GUI based in differents toolkits.
- Work in the web page. I think that the better it look like  the more people 
will be interested in getting envolved in this project. This is a real truth.

I have been using DDD, but I am sure I am not the person the more have use it. 
So I would like you to talk about things you think could be improved or are 
lacked.

..

_______________________________________________
Ddd mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ddd
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBIIiFMwud8AVYZYawRAtZpAJ94+NNmOGhuhddEp+QJYWG3KI3lAACg0rjE
qwjxkH4qspiG9VOJ19bwMoY=
=6kEk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.