Re: Makes sense go with DDD ahead?

Burlen Loring <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.debugging.ddd.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

in my experience there is no gdb interface as useful as ddd. This 
despite the fact that it is written in motif, and often crashes a lot.  
I hope you go ahead with your plans.

Burlen


Jose María Gómez Vergara wrote:
> Hello all:
> 	I have been taking a long time without receiving any email from ddd and 
> ddd-bug distribution list. I have not received any feedback about DDD lastly.
>
> 	In the savannah site for DDD there is not any bug reported, no questions, no 
> tasks,  although I know that exist a lot of them.
>
> 	So, I am wondering if DDD worth it at this time. I mean, I would like to put 
> effort to take DDD one step beyond if it makes sense, but if you think you 
> have found a similar software like e.g kgdb or similar that have taken this 
> position and DDD is a obsolete one, I would prefer dedicate more time to some 
> more usuful projects.
>
> 	What do you think about this.?
>
> 	I am really interested in your opinion.
>
> 	Thanks a lot for your time.
>
> /JmGV 
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ddd mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ddd
>   


-- 
Burlen Loring
Kitware, Inc.
R&D Engineer
28 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-371-3971 x137
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.