Re: Makes sense go with DDD ahead?
"R. Bernstein" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.debugging.ddd.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Doesn't come near what you ask, but from the NEWS file of ddd-test6 (http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=61395) - Add x86 theme for changing display expressions to x86 registers and flag-bits. Change Data/Memory examine behavior when used on Intel registers so that %reg is the same as $reg. Contributed by Zarko Zivanov. >> I have been taking a long time without receiving any email from >> ddd and >> ddd-bug distribution list. I have not received any feedback about DDD >> lastly. > > I really like ddd and it is the only gdb frontend I use (ok - besides > other debuggers like Lauterbach Trace32) and I would really like it if > ddd evolves. My main feature requests would be: > > - a ddd release without the old fashioned motif gui. I prefer to use > the keyboard and I like the split windows configuration of ddd > (especially on 24" screens) but all this is really painfull if you > have to move the cursor to the right position before you can type > anything ... I would really appreciate a ddd release with gtk frontend > > - data display layout. ddd seems to establish some strange kind of > order on the different displays - as some of them are only valid in > particular scopes, these displays vanish and reappear when leaving or > entering the corresponding functions. The display are then rearranged > every time with the annoying effect that some of them move to the > right or downwards more and more ... It would be nice if these stayed > in place all the time > > - I often work on remote targets (microcontrollers) with memory mapped > I/O registers controlling the various peripheral units. It would > really be nice if one could browse all these registers in a structured > manner (e.g. via menus and submenus), it would be even better if one > could also alter these registers. I think that is one of the main > advantages that debuggers (like the Trace32 debugger) for embedded > systems have. GDB already allows accessing these I/O registers - as > long as you know the address, so a clever interface might be really > helpful at this point. > > So, all in all, I use ddd, I like ddd and I will use it in the future > und would like to like ddd even more in the future ;-) > > Ciao, Fabian > > > _______________________________________________ > Ddd mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ddd > >