RE: Makes sense go with DDD ahead?

Hello Jose,
A while ago I announced that I had abandoned ddd and was using gps.
That is true, but only up to a point.  You and others asked me why I had
done this and what it was about gps that I drew me to it.  I would like
to be helpful to you and the other folks who use ddd and I would like to
see/try the improved software.  So when there are improvements would you
please let me know so that I can upgrade.
 
I have developed software for twenty-five years and in that time I have
used a variety of development environments.  I have watched the
development of most of the "modern" IDEs.  For me it has become
important to not jump around between different tools too much.  I like a
full featured environment that includes source control, cross
referencing between modules, robust search features, and a full GUI
interface.  One example of this is MS Visual Studio another is GPS.
There are several others.  
 
I would be happy to provide details about specific features if you wish.

 
That said, I do use ddd.  I use it when I have core dumps because it
works well for quickly identifying why a program crashed.  I remain
convinced that gps can do this also, but I have not discovered yet how
to do it.  
 
Cheers,  John
All will be well.  And all shall be well.  All manner of thing shall be
well. -- Lady Julian of Norwich

_______________________________________________
Ddd mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ddd