RE: Is the project still alive ?
"Patrick Monnerat" <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Jul 2014 12:14:08 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.debugging.insight |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AB5E58B87EB73C46A38073D8F459F113D9FEE5@dataspheresrv01> |
Keith Seitz wrote: >> By the way: @Keith: did you received the tarball of my git repo ?=20 >> Maybe this is time to publish or update or comment or... reject it. > Yeah, I have received it, but because of my recent tendinitis problems, I have zero time for play. All my free/play time is scheduled for rest. :-( I'm really sorry for you your tendinitis does not go away. In the meantime, you can give me write access to the sourceware git repository: I'll upload my "work in progress" there and so we'll have a common reference base. Of course, if you don't like it you can zap it after all: in any case there will be no damage to what officially exists yet because the git repo is currently empty. > I will do my best to take a look at what you've done. It sounds like you're headed in a direction that encompasses the "ideal" build for insight. Perhaps I can attempt to define some sort of extension API for gdb to cleanup the rest. [But I seriously doubt that (some) gdb maintainers would allow this.] I don't think there's an "ideal" solution, with regards to the project structure. In a modern approach, we should not deal with bundles and "third part" code should be independent libraries. We could decide to do so with (i)tcl/tk and iwidgets and even with libgui (by having it as a project by itself). But gdb is definitely not such an API library, and it has itself a bundled structure. Thus what you call "ideal" is just the less bad compromise :-/ Regards, Patrick