Re: [Valgrind-users] Valgrind-3.15.0.RC1 is available for testing

Mark Wielaard <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.debugging.valgrind.devel,gmane.comp.debugging.valgrind
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 09:02 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 11:11 +0200, Julian Seward wrote:
> > A first release candidate for 3.15.0 is available at
> > https://sourceware.org/pub/valgrind/valgrind-3.15.0.RC1.tar.bz2
> > (md5 = 56d9f5e25615d48110da0aa5764d481e)
> > 
> > Please give it a try on platforms that are important for you.  If
> > no serious
> > issues are reported, the 3.15.0 final release will happen on 12
> > April, that
> > is, this coming Friday.
> 
> For users are binary rpms for fedora and centos in koji and on copr
> if
> people find that easier to use for testing:
> 
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1246875
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mjw/valgrind-3.15.0/
> 
> For developers the build.logs do contain the make regtest diffs for
> any
> failing tests.

I did new builds with the one extra commit and a couple of bug fixes:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1247329
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mjw/valgrind-3.15.0/build/881204/

This includes the following extra fixes:

valgrind commit b2d2da64b0de1c4d657b63187967b68606e84711
GET_STARTREGS for s390: fix register constraint

KDE#406352
RC1 fails cachegrind/callgrind ann tests because of missing a.c

KDE#406360
memcheck/tests/libstdc++.supp needs more supression variants

KDE#406354
dhat is broken on x86 (32bit)

KDE#406355
mcsignopass and mcsigpass fails due to a difference in gdb output

KDE#406357
RC1 fails gdbserver_tests because of gdb output change

I hand tested them all (because I made the mistake of only running the
nonexp-regtest (which doesn't include gdbserver_tests) and messed up
the data on the a.c file, which generates a warning, but shows the fix
itself is good.

May I push these fixes to git?
Should they go on the master branch, or is there a 3.15.0 branch
already?

Thanks,

Mark
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.