Re: Question regarding 'Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)'

Thomas Wollenzin <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Jun 2024 06:51:53 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.debugging.valgrind
Message-ID <PAVPR10MB746523E7DDC4E87D1C6CFB3B89C82@PAVPR10MB7465.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
That's indeed very interesting Paul. Thanks for making me aware.

Thomas

________________________________
From: Paul Floyd via Valgrind-users <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 10:07 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Valgrind-users] Question regarding 'Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)'



On 19-06-24 08:15, Thomas Wollenzin wrote:
> Thanks for the hint, Sean.
> While that might work perfectly fine, I'm personally not a big fan of
> these types of tools. They're fine for proofing a theory but shouldn't
> be used to 'cover up' developer mistakes. Code should be written as
> solidly as possible.


Read more about the proposal here

https://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2022/p2723r0.html

I'm fairly certain that things like this will be part of C++ in the next
5 years or so. That won't be using this option directly, more likely
part of a 'profiles' feature.


A+
Paul


_______________________________________________
Valgrind-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users

_______________________________________________
Valgrind-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users