Re: Question regarding 'Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)'
Thomas Wollenzin <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Jun 2024 06:51:53 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.debugging.valgrind |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <PAVPR10MB746523E7DDC4E87D1C6CFB3B89C82@PAVPR10MB7465.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> |
That's indeed very interesting Paul. Thanks for making me aware. Thomas ________________________________ From: Paul Floyd via Valgrind-users <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 10:07 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Valgrind-users] Question regarding 'Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)' On 19-06-24 08:15, Thomas Wollenzin wrote: > Thanks for the hint, Sean. > While that might work perfectly fine, I'm personally not a big fan of > these types of tools. They're fine for proofing a theory but shouldn't > be used to 'cover up' developer mistakes. Code should be written as > solidly as possible. Read more about the proposal here https://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2022/p2723r0.html I'm fairly certain that things like this will be part of C++ in the next 5 years or so. That won't be using this option directly, more likely part of a 'profiles' feature. A+ Paul _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users _______________________________________________ Valgrind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-users