Re: Patches for ROX-Filer and ROX-Lib

"Thomas Leonard" <[email protected]> wrote:

> 2008/10/8 Stephen Watson <[email protected]>:
> > "Thomas Leonard" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> 2008/10/5 Stephen Watson <[email protected]>:
> >> >  - Create start script 'rox' since there isn't an install script to
do
> > it
> >> > anymore.  Adds both a menu entry and a button in the options
> > (Compatability
> >> > section).
> >>
> >> I didn't add this (sorry). It doesn't feel right at all. Putting an
> >> "install myself" item in every program would be a horrible UI. It
> >> should be done by the installer (bundled or otherwise), or the user,
> >> not as part of the UI to the main program.
> >
> > ROX-Lib runs the filer by calling the rox script.  A new user doing a
fresh
> > install from source won't get any such script!
> 
> OK, maybe the install script needs to come back? I guess people were
> using it after all...

I was.  Installing from source on machines with no internet access.

-- 
Stephen Watson     http://www.kerofin.demon.co.uk/
If you read this on a mailing list, send any reply back to the list and not
to me.  Not even CC.
"I'm the Doctor, and you're in the biggest Library in the universe. Look me
up!"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/