Re: Would switching to Qt be a good idea?
Mark Ballard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.desktop.xfce.devel.version4 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMJSjjuZXe2R9GpdgY=ohEpYUQNVU_rtjZwFStPywvajjFPS2Q@mail.gmail.com> |
I for one would welcome any effort to stop the over-simplification of xfce. Operating Gnome apps is like trying to knit while wearing mittens, or type with club fists. On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 12:45, samuel ammonius <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > If you fork the project, do the work, attract enough developers to >> maintain it, and eventually prove it's better, then it will become a >> de-facto better project. Maintainers are not stubborn gatekeepers, they try >> to do what's best for the project, but they rarely commit to accepting code >> that has not been written yet. >> > > Thanks for informing me about all of that. I'll try to start with smaller > things like mousepad and the screenshooter, and move on to things like > thunar and the panel when I'm familiar with the process of converting > GTK/GLib to Qt. > > IMHO, time would be better invested in a Wayland compositor, but that's >> another huge task. >> > > What would a wayland compositor do? > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 4:27 AM Olivier Fourdan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Thu, 7 Jul 2022 at 19:06, samuel ammonius <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I posted a similar question on the XFCE forum, where a moderator told me >>> I should go here. The forum post is here >>> <https://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?pid=67869#p67869>. >>> >>> The reason I was suggesting this is because GTK4 removed menus >>> completely, because they were too "X11-centric". I think this is just an >>> excuse to force people to use their designs, and XFCE's adoption of >>> client-side decoration is proof that it's working. I'm not complaining >>> about CSD in particular, but I'm trying to say that over the years, similar >>> situations will arise and GTK will start to become a larger burden with >>> every version that gets released. >>> >> I know that switching to Qt isn't something little. What I'm asking is, >>> if I can fork all of XFCE's gui and make it use Qt, is it possible at all >>> that it might get merged? >>> >> >> This is a theoretical question impossible to answer without anything >> tangible to evaluate. >> >> This is all open source, so eventually, the best ideas win. >> >> If you fork the project, do the work, attract enough developers to >> maintain it, and eventually prove it's better, then it will become a >> de-facto better project. Maintainers are not stubborn gatekeepers, they try >> to do what's best for the project, but they rarely commit to accepting code >> that has not been written yet. >> >> >>> It won't take as long as it might sound because I've made both GTK and >>> Qt applications and Qt is at least twice as easy to deal with. >>> >> >> So if you believe it's a good idea, have the will, time and energy to do >> it, then why not? >> >> IMHO, time would be better invested in a Wayland compositor, but that's >> another huge task. >> >> Cheers >> Olivier >> _______________________________________________ >> Xfce4-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Xfce4-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev _______________________________________________ Xfce4-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev