Re: RFC: xfwm4: drop legacy KDE systray emulation
"Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Oct 2022 11:19:39 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.desktop.xfce.devel.version4,gmane.comp.xfce.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 20.10.22 02:44, Matt Connell wrote: > Considering that portage failed to apply your patch, specifically for > the reason that the patch specified to remove the below line[1] which > was *not present* in the copy of configure.ac portage uses, What exact sources are they using ? Note that configure.ac is generated from configure.ac.in by autogen.sh > it is > probably safe to say that the ebuild doesn't make use of this feature > anyway. As you stated originally, it isn't used unless explicitly > enabled. If they ever used it, there must be some --enable-kde-system parameter to configure / autogen.sh. If there isn't any, it's certainly disabled. > Now, I did some more nosing around in the Status Tray panel plugin > settings. The settings I have show two sections, one for "Status > Notifiers" and one for "Systray Icons" and the things I use on the > daily are actually split between these two sections. It seems Telegram, > nheko and Steam are "Status Notifiers" whereas Signal and Deluge are > "Systray Icons". I'd guess "systray icons" is the first spec, "status notifiers" the second (dbus based). If you happen to be a bit bored, you could test what happens if you prevent them from accessing the session dbus. Personally, I don't see any practical reason why dbus shall be needed for such simple things - X11 protocol is really sufficient for that and the most portable way for that (think of remote clients). > I have no idea if these distinctions are semantically > meaningful, or if they are relevant to the discussion at hand, but I > figured I would add it in case someone else goes spelunking in the > future. Since you most likely don't have xfwm built w/ --enable-kde-systray and everything's fine for you, that old legacy stuff can't be of any practical concer for you :) > Regardless, I've stood down from my initial knee-jerk panic at losing a > relied-upon feature, at least for now. :) In general, it's better to raise some false alarms and talk things out than having unpleasant surprises later. --mtx -- --- Hinweis: unverschlüsselte E-Mails können leicht abgehört und manipuliert werden ! Für eine vertrauliche Kommunikation senden Sie bitte ihren GPG/PGP-Schlüssel zu. --- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult Free software and Linux embedded engineering [email protected] -- +49-151-27565287 _______________________________________________ Xfce4-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.xfce.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce4-dev