Re: Notes... The case for an open client
Elektron <elektron_rc5-FFYn/[email protected]> Mon, 16 Aug 2004 04:46:11 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.distributed-net.hardware |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> ASCII files are a horror to parse in perl?, or python? Sure beats > having > to release several hundred binary P2P clients Huge ones, yes. They take way too long to load. And I hate python, but that's probably just me. >> Because there aren't 256 big projects yet. > > It's not an issue of big projects, but an issue of freedom of > choice in choosing key spaces to search. As Dan earlier put it > not having a chance of finding the key because of luck of the > draw locking you into the key space where it was not. It's still luck anyway. And if you want, feel free to search whatever keyspace you wish. > The only reason to have such coarse granularity, is to support > competitive non-cooperating efforts to search keys, where near realtime > sharing of searched key space was prohibitive. Everyone should use d.net! The problem with splitting it up a lot is then you have the problem of trusting people to search those blocks. You may work on your competition's blocks first, to try to stop them from finding the key (I'm not sure if this actually works though). There is also a high potential of sabotaging the entire project, unless you can find a lot of trusted servers (and projects willing to cooperate). And then, you don't get as nice stats. - Purr _______________________________________________ Hardware mailing list Hardware-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected] http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/hardware