Re: Notes... The case for an open client
jbass-/[email protected] Mon, 16 Aug 2004 03:16:05 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.distributed-net.hardware |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
And you have not yet found a way to calculate your search order in a reasonable number of cycles. 144 cycles is far too many. Write the code, and someone may implement it. That is the d.net way. pre-computed 16 bit segments, sorted, and table indirect .. cycle or two to fetch from cache on a typical cpu, stored in FPGA block ram as ROM, nearly free in cost. So claiming a huge overhead without thinking about better ways to implement the function is just how clueless? I don't need to defend jack for expressing a preferrence that you turned into a personal attack claiming absolute fore knowledge, and appear unable to defend your assertions on the grounds that YOU don't know JACK about the deterministic algorithms used to generate the keys for the challenge that you assert are pure random in your not so professional attacks. So get off your hobby horse, and start acting like a grownup. So drop it OK ... this is not the forum for asserting you are GOD and calling everyone else clueless shitheads for doing something you don't like or approve of. John _______________________________________________ Hardware mailing list Hardware-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected] http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/hardware