Re: Notes... The case for an open client
jbass-/[email protected] Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:09:40 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.distributed-net.hardware |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Elektron <elektron_rc5-FFYn/[email protected]> writes: > Neither have you given any evidence that hash is weak, or produces an > n-bit result with biased run lengths. After your table of run lengths, > you give this argument: No - because you started out with a tirade about why it was impossible, instead of simply asking why I might be considering this conjecture: RSA Key run lengths: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10 9 3 4 2 0 0 0 0x67b9e0ec4f20d95e; //DES Test 9 6 2 2 1 0 0 0 0x43d26dd827; //RC5-40 Test 10 4 3 2 1 0 0 1 0x510678042628; //RC5-48 Test 20 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0xda989a5ab31114; //RC5-56 Test 7 9 5 1 4 0 0 0 0xf918c79c9f1be582; //RC5-64 Test 13 10 2 3 1 1 0 0 0x3d986e6bf1be4bda; //DES Challenge 15 10 3 3 0 0 0 0 0x9909C24C742B53; //RC5-56 Challenge 13 7 5 3 2 0 0 0 0x39D0F454C17DDE63; //RC5-64 Challenge -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 97 67 27 18 11 1 0 1 Which for 453 or so bits, is biased, but not horribly so. John _______________________________________________ Hardware mailing list Hardware-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected] http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/hardware