Re: As everybody get up ...
"John L. Bass" <jbass-/[email protected]> Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:59:05 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.distributed-net.hardware |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Guerric, AWESOME :) .... under 18500 slices, 37K LUT's is a pretty nice fit. Slightly better than where mine tiled out on the Virtex-E's, before I gave up with fine tuning the floor planning for PAR so it would actually route. I assume done with tiled macros and hand placement to avoid the routing mess from the pipeline terms between stages? Can you tell us more? Combinatorial depth per pipeline stage? Did you break it per stage, or twice per stage (for arithmetics and the shifters)? What did you use for the retiming memory, LUT rams or shifters? HDL design? Schematic Design? Have fun, John Hello, As everybody is getting up :), I will try to find the time to finalize our RC5 core. It is a fully unrolled (and pipelined) core. It is quite optimized (I'm a HDL designer) and the target is currently Virtex4-LX FPGA (but it don't use much of specific features of this platform). It should fit in a LX40 device (18500 slices max) (no chance to fit into a S3-200 :) ). Frequency should be around 200 Mhz (or more) and 1 key test per clock cycle. I hope to give you good news in a few days. Of course, the source will be given as there no commercial interest for a high throughput key scheduler (which is the main part of a RC5 brute force engine). PS: still remains the possibility of working on separate ranges, dedicated to FPGAs (or others). At least at the beginning, before finding a better solution. -- Guerric Meurice de Dormale UCL DICE/Crypto Group http://www.dice.ucl.ac.be/crypto/ _______________________________________________ Hardware mailing list Hardware-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected] http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/hardware