Re: Fully unrolled RC5 on FPGA
Martin Klingensmith <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:39:31 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.distributed-net.hardware |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It is quite possible to fit an RC5-72 gate on a cheap, low power FPGA that a student (myself) can afford. It is a very different type of implementation and I haven't yet done it myself to figure out the good and bad points (I'm estimating that it won't be very impressive). Regarding discrete logic, do you have a large air-conditioned room and a 500 amp 5v power supply? One would be mad to attempt it ;-) -- Martin K Olivier Meyer wrote: > Folding at home is trying to use graphic cards, but there is one > reason why FPGA is much better: > A graphics card is NOT DESIGNED to execute general purpose code. It is > made to render video and 3D images. What Folding has done is they have > managed to use the restricted instruction set to do their > protein-folding stuff. An FPGA design is the one thing less > customisable than an ASIC. We can choose whatever we want to put on > the FPGA, and we can make it check 1 key/cycle. I wonder, can our FPGA > implementation be used on cheap, low power FPGAs that a student can > afford (hint, hint!). > > Has anyone tried to use 74HC discrete logic to make an RC5-72 core? > > _______________________________________________ Hardware mailing list Hardware-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected] http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/hardware