Re: RSA Challenges
"John L. Bass" <jbass-/[email protected]> Fri, 1 Jun 2007 16:51:59 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.distributed-net.hardware |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
If you are thinking of brute-force search, it would have taken a long time to get the prize in any case. If you have some algorithmic breakthrough that can search for RC5 keys faster than brute-force, however, your achievement will be rewarded by the technology community with much more than just prize money. -- Burt Brute force via any counter driving the entire key schedule and decrypt is clearly a decade or more work, unless done with a very specialized high end FPGA array. And even then, the power costs for the project would far exceed the prize in aggregate, but make an interesting lottery for those deploying and FPGA based Reconfigurable Computing array. We have been exploring this via the distributed.net hardware list for a while, including building some high performance comodity FPGA engines based on this project. I have developed another strategy based on partial symbolic solution to reduce the search effort (something of a bolean SAT approach), for which I picked up a dozen high end Itanium servers with large caches to be augmented with an FPGA array, specifically to demonstrate this approach. Unfortunately I was counting on some or all of the remaining prizes to pay for the $30K equipment and significant electric bill this has been running up for the research. I clearly would not have made this recient investment had the project sunset been clear. I doubt, other than the prizes, that there is any other way to recover the losses for this project. I suspect I'm not the only one either, which is why a much more graceful termination, with a one or two year sunset would have been MUCH MUCH better, allowing people to plan and judge the project risks of not meeting a well known deadline better. Besides RC5, I and others, have significant factoring projects underway as well ... at a significant cost. None of us would have spent the electric bills without some hope of cracking the factoring prizes. Again, a sunset that was well known, would avoid countless wasted efforts, and some resentment about the unplanned withdrawal of the challenges. I'd suggest a sunset of Dec 31, 2009, or even 2008, would have been much more reasonable, and would avoid some direct resentment of EMC/RSA for project losses which could have been avoided with planning and advance notic. John From: [email protected] Subject: RE: RSA Challenges Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 17:59:08 -0400 To: <jbass-/[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Dear John -- Thanks very much for your message. The reorganization of RSA Laboratories as the security group of the new EMC Innovation Network was an appropriate time to announce a number of changes that had been considered for a while, including the challenges as well as the new "historical" status of the FAQ, and status changes in various PKCS documents. I'm sorry that the news was so abrupt, and I appreciate your suggestion about a delayed conclusion. A distributed effort to solve the RC5-72 challenge http://www.distributed.net/rc5/ has been underway for several years, with a lot of work remaining (0.4% done), and we didn't see the cancelation as significantly affecting that work. However, I do understand that there may be other efforts and explorations that are not as public yet, such as the one you mention. If you are thinking of brute-force search, it would have taken a long time to get the prize in any case. If you have some algorithmic breakthrough that can search for RC5 keys faster than brute-force, however, your achievement will be rewarded by the technology community with much more than just prize money. -- Burt -----Original Message----- From: John L. Bass [mailto:jbass-/[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 3:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RSA Challenges Hi Burt, I'm curious why they were abruptly cancelled. I've been working on an attack for the remaining RC5 challenges that I was hoping would yield results later this summer or fall. It would have been nice if you guys would have simply left both sets of challenges in place, with an update that they end in a year or so. Have fun, John _______________________________________________ Hardware mailing list Hardware-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected] http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/hardware