Re: RSA Challenges
"John L. Bass" <jbass-/[email protected]> Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:44:25 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.distributed-net.hardware |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
John, thanks for your frank feedback about the impact of our decision on your research. Was rather hoping EMC/RSA might reconsider withdrawing the abrupt Challenge terminations, and set a reasonable sunset a couple years out. I (and others) don't consider it fair to take the full PR rewards for creating the Challenges, then abruptly withdraw them. Countless others answered YOUR Challenge with significant labor, direct equipment and energy costs ... and are unable to collect in exchange. There is a serious question of fairness here regarding Work-In-Progress for both factoring and RC5 challenges. You guys started this ... let's be reasonable about shuting it down. Maybe your products are secure from these attacks, as has been demonstrated for the last decade ... and will continue to be so, in which case no one will collect much, if any of the remaining Challenges. On the other hand, a reasonable sunset of a couple years out is only fair, as it's been clear that all attacks are multi-year investments in resources, and should be allowed to conclude with a reasonable known sunset period. Even my project is 3-6 months out, *IF* I got the math/algorithm right the first time, and it's been running since last fall. It's certainly your right to cancel without a reasonable sunset. I certainly don't think it's right either, for EMC/RSA to initiate the Challenge, and burn a lot of peoples resources, without a fair sunset period. John _______________________________________________ Hardware mailing list Hardware-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected] http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/hardware