Re: new cuda client slower

<[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.distributed-net.rc5
Message-ID <[email protected]>
For me it looks like the client has the same speed as before.

Greetings,

Robin 'Robinski' Harmsen

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: rc5-bounces+distributed=rharmsen.nl-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected] [mailto:rc5-bounces+distributed=rharmsen.nl-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected]] Namens Jeff Lawson
Verzonden: zondag 1 februari 2009 19:50
Aan: 'D.net Discussion'; 'bert'
Onderwerp: Re: [RC5] new cuda client slower

Is the core being selected by the client the same in both of those
benchmarks?  The core selection by the CUDA client is currently done by a
microbench, which makes it very susceptible to measurement variations.


-----Original Message-----
From: rc5-bounces+bovine=distributed.net-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected]
[mailto:rc5-bounces+bovine=distributed.net-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected]] On Behalf
Of bert
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 7:18 AM
To: D.net Discussion
Subject: [RC5] new cuda client slower

I downloaded the new cuda beta this morning and noticed that it's doing 
about half what the previous beta was doing(rate at about 45,000,000 
keys/sec compared to about 80,000,000 keys/sec with the previous beta). 
Is there a reason it is doing this? I'm probably gonna go back and 
finish the other client til it expires in about 20 hours. That sucks.



Bert
_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected]
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5


_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected]
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected]
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.