Re: Clients 507 and 508 doing OGR-27 work
Joseph Kaye <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.distributed-net.rc5 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
waldo kitty wrote: > funny thing about this is that i just originated and carried on a thread in the > perproxy list not more than 2 days before the start of OGR-27 and even then > mentioned that OGR-27 would hopefully use a different project name than ogrng > specifically to avoid this problem... what's wrong with naming the project after > the actual project? > > ie: ogr24, ogr24-2, ogr25, ogr26, ogr27, ogr28 etc (the -2 is the > rework/validation project... > > I believe the intent was that OGR-NG would be able to do OGR27, 28, 29, etc without new clients (aside from new cores, or bugfixes).. --Joseph _______________________________________________ rc5 mailing list rc5-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected] http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5