Re: stream vs cuda rates

Korey Nixon <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.distributed-net.rc5
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I'm actually on a 5750, which does
~ 10,000 blocks/day. Not bad. Much cheaper. Good card.

bert wrote:

Korey Nixon wrote:

Indeed. Stream client (5870) gets about 20 thousand blocks/day.
Maybe a little more.

bert wrote:

Is it true that the stream client key rate is at least 5x that of the
cuda client? I get about 4,000 blocks or so per GTX 260(I have 2) per
day so a ATI 5870 with a stream client should do about 20K blocks a day?
I've been curious about the stream client ever since it's been out since
I don't have a ATI video card.

Bert
_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected]
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected]
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

------------------------------------------------------------------------

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.704 / Virus Database: 270.14.60/2495 - Release Date: 11/10/09 14:56:00

I also remember someone who made a web page that had what a certain
processor did in blocks per day,I hope someone does one for the stream
and cuda clients(what a particular video card does per day) .
Thanks,Korey if you got a 5870 that's impressive with just one card!

Bert
Bert
_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected]
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5

_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5-Ra3b/QYEcJ3d140v2zMXi0fjHoOT/h/[email protected]
http://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.