Re: package/sharing improvement proposal

[email protected] (Paul Jarc)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.djb.package
Organization What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid?
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"D. J. Bernstein" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Laurent G. Bercot writes:
>> It would be nice to have a way of indicating whether a "host"-shared
>> directory can be mounted read-only or must allow write access.
>
> What exactly do you mean by ``read-only''? Why is it a useful concept?
> Is /etc/resolv.conf ``read-only''? What problem is being solved here?

AIUI, this would be documentation of the fact that a certain directory
is (or is not) used in a spool-like way; i.e., the package writes to
that directory as part of its normal operation.  Directories used in
this way must be on read-write filesystems while the package is in
use; other directories can be on read-only filesystems, to protect
against filesystem corruption in case of a crash.

Of course, the admin may want to modify those files, and will have to
remount the filesystem read-write to do that, if it is normally
mounted read-only.  The admin may also want some of the package's
files to be modified as part of the normal operation of another
package, such as a DHCP client.  So the package's own package/sharing
won't always dictate the admin's choice of mounting options, but it's
useful information when making that choice.


paul
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.