Re: djblinux?

Stefan Karrmann <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Jun 2003 22:59:58 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.djb.package
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Paul Jarc (Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:24:13PM -0400):
> Stefan Karrmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Paul Jarc (Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:45:08PM -0400):
> >> Stefan Karrmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> Why not breaking backward compatibility?  Create:
> >>> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     default         1 Jun 17 10:51 /usr -> usr
> >>> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     default         7 Jun 17 10:51 /bin -> bin
> >>> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     default         7 Jun 17 10:51 /var -> var
> >   lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     default         7 Jun 17 10:51 /lib -> lib
> >   lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     default         7 Jun 17 10:51 /etc -> etc
> >
> >> What do you mean?  A symlink that points to itself is broken.
> >
> > Yes, so every non-/package style software breaks in djb-os.
> 
> What's the benefit?

A pure /package-OS with /package, /command, /service, /shared, /slash,
/fs, /home.

-- 
Stefan