Re: execline-1.05 non-root installation problem

* Laurent Bercot:

>  On the other hand, if slashpackage users can agree on a "standard" way
> of specifying the /package root, while bearing in mind that only /package
> is fully supported and anything else is the admin's problem, then I'm
> willing to adapt.

i don't understand all this.  aren't symlinks supposed to solve this
problem?  i have all the /package locations as they're supposed to be
and none of them on a physical directory named /package etc.

  clemens