Re: execline-1.05 non-root installation problem
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:27:14 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.djb.package |
|---|---|
| Organization | What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid? |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> wrote: > For import, this is simple: if conf-compile/import exists, prepend > every line with the value of SP_ROOT. I could do that, but it would be easier if each dependency were configured in a separate file, since sp-install already has code to handle that. I also think it's more useful to users that way. E.g., idtools has conf-compile/depend_bglibs and conf-compile/depend_skalibs. Among other things, this lets the build system track changes more precisely, so rebuilds don't do unnecessary work. Would it take much work to convert your packages to this scheme? > For sp_root, this is even simpler: echo $SP_ROOT > conf-compile/sp_root Some dependencies may be installed in $HOME/package while others are in /package, etc., so I think it's best if packages let each dependency be independently configurable, even though sp-install doesn't currently take advantage of that. paul