registration request

new package: mail/posterity
description: publish email archives using email protocols
future URL: <URL:http://multivac.cwru.edu./posterity/>
commands: posterity-imap, posterity-pop

<URL:http://sourceforge.net/projects/posterity/> exists, but it's a
year old and still completely empty.  I've found no other potential
conflicts.

We try to avoid confusion in choosing names, but how much confusion is
acceptable?  Certainly we want to use new names for commands, since
they could confuse software.  Human confusion seems somewhat more
tolerable, and it's hard to find names that have *never* been used
before.


paul