Re: Conversion to /package
Dan Kegel <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Sep 2003 15:24:39 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.djb.package |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Another possibility I was thinking about was patching the programs that > make these software packages use the paths they use: the GNU auto*-suite. > > I began to patch autoconf and automake and all looked very promisingly: > I was able to install strace like this: > ... > ./configure && > make && ... > make install > ... > Very easy. Just ./configure; make; make install. As they always told us > at GNU. That sounds great. If you make the change a runtime option, e.g. ./configure --/package then there's a good chance that the autoconf/automake maintainers would accept your patches. > But the problem with this installation method is that there are too many > GNU packages out there that use and require too many different versions > of the GNU auto*-tools to let this method be practicable. Yeah, there would be a long lead time, but if you get this patch into the main automake/autoconf distribution, then in a couple years, all the packages out there would eventually end up with support for /package built in. Peaceful coexistence. What a concept! - Dan