Re: Package naming advice requested

On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 [email protected] wrote:

> I've considered the name qsender, but that appears to be used for
> something else. It seems to me that qcookie is too vague, and qfromok
> doesn't have a ring to it.

FWIW, I have a similar-sounding package that I call 'sendok'. So you
should:
 - probably avoid that name :)
 - consider merging our efforts, if the package appears to be a
   duplication, subset, or superset of functionality

-Peff