Re: stunnel-ed httpd
clemensF <[email protected]> Mon, 4 Mar 2002 22:29:46 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.djb.publicfile |
|---|---|
| Organization | uhm, no |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Paul Jarc: > Eh, ucspi-ssl won't change the URL, of course, though you might like > it anyway. I guess you need to patch httpd regardless. true. publicfile's httpd doesn't accept https:// unpatched. and i think ucspi-ssl is the way to go, though i'd be interested if stunnel also cuts it. clemens fischer