Re: mutilog via fifo

(* Replyto set to avoid the auto responders *)

Paul Jarc wrote:

> Daryl Tester <[email protected]> wrote:

>> The only problem with this method is that the messages that were going
>> to stdout and stderr (e.g. from tcpserver) are now going elsewhere -
>> depending on how you invoked svscan this might be readproctitle,
>> or just dumped into the ether.

> No, those messages would still go where they were going before - to
> the log pipe created by svscan.  But since multilog is no longer
> reading that pipe, it'll eventually fill up and tcpserver will block
> when writing to it.

D'oh, you're right (both on where the output would go and the result).
That outcome would be a worse result.

Cheers,
  --dt