Re: mutilog via fifo

On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:56:29 +0930
Daryl Tester <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Is this a good solution or is this a dirty way to log to multilog?
> 
> It's a solution.  Typically when I've found myself in similar
> situations I've modified the original program to spit out the logs to
> stdout/stderr, sans timestamps (which typically have to be removed as
> well - I figure in for a penny, in for a pound).

So, what's the difference between elhttp using "/dev/stdout" as logfile
and e.g. publicfile? Both are invoked the in an equal way by tcpserver,
however, elhttp does not send its logs through the logpipe svscan
creates, but publicfile does. Apparently publicfile sends its logs in a
different way to stdout?

R.

-- 
___________________________________________________________________
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak
aloud and remove all doubt.

+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Richard Lucassen, Utrecht                                        |
| Public key and email address:                                    |
| http://www.lucassen.org/mail-pubkey.html                         |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+