Re: mutilog via fifo
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) Sun, 03 Aug 2008 15:27:31 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.djb.syslog |
|---|---|
| Organization | What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid? |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
richard lucassen <[email protected]> wrote: > BTW, just wondering: does a named pipe (like I use now) create extra > load or disk access compared to a "normal" pipe? Just a little disk activity when opening it. After that it's just like an anonymous pipe. But since this pipe isn't kept open by svscan, if tcpserver and multilog both happen to die at the same time, any log data waiting in the pipe at that point will be lost. paul