Re: Seeking clarifaction of tai64nlocal and leap seconds

Brian Reichert <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:36:29 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.djb.syslog
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 08:05:57AM -0600, Andy Bradford wrote:
> The fact that
> it is TAI64N format is not  sufficient to indicate that the timestamp is
> in fact from a TAI clock.

This one observation pretty sums up the source of some incorrect
assumptions on my part on this topic.  Thanks for pointing it out...

> Fun stuff.
> 
> Andy

-- 
Brian Reichert				<[email protected]>
BSD admin/developer at large