Re: Seeking clarifaction of tai64nlocal and leap seconds
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:24:28 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.djb.syslog |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Eyrie |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Andy Bradford" <[email protected]> writes: > Nowhere does he claim that it will eliminate the need for a GPS source > or other time sources. He only claims that his software will eliminate > clock skew. But, after 3 months of no network time input, 0.21 seconds > off seems pretty impressive to me. It all depends on what your goal is. ntpd will generally maintain the clock considerably more accurately than that, but you may not need the additional precision. 0.21 seconds off is enough to occasionally cause weird build problems if you're running make on separate hosts with a shared network file system that has sub-second timestamp precision. Many people don't have this problem, of course. :) -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>