Re: [Opencxx-users] refining the Synopsis APIs
"Markus Elfring" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.documentation.synopsis |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://freemail.web.de/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Note that Synopsis already contains an ASG, though confusingly calls it 'AST'. Please consider that the syntax tree can also become a syntax graph like in the Keystone approach. S = syntax or semantic T = tree, G = graph Is more "confusion" needed?