Re: type of ptree nodes

Hi Chiba,

thanks for the quick response !

Shigeru Chiba wrote:

> The implementation of the using declaration is quite temporal.  It was 
> added
> to OpenC++ when the using declaration was introduced in the C++ standard.
> It should be reimplemented as you wrote.

Thank you, that confirms my impression.

>> A similar situation is with 'typedef' declarations. The type specifier,
>> too, is just a list of atoms, instead of something with an encoded 
>> name / type.
>> Why is that ?
> 
> 
> That is because I didn't need the encoded name/type when I was writing 
> OpenC++.
> If you need it, sure, you should extend the type specifier.  The program 
> includes
> a number of things that have not been implemented since I didn't have 
> time to do
> it.  I carefully prioritized what I should implement first to maximize 
> my productivity!

As I'd like to work on this in the context of synopsis, I'd definitely
prefer to collaborate, i.e. at least try to design (and document) the
missing pieces of the parse tree together with OpenCxx developers.
Is there any interest into this from OpenCxx users / developers ? Is
OpenCxx still being developped at this point ?

Kind regards,
		Stefan