Re: Re: software design clarification

Markus Elfring wrote:
> Stefan Seefeld schrieb:
>> The easiest way to get involved is to download, run, and study the code,
>> then look at the issue tracker for inspiration, if you haven't run into
>> any bug or limitation yourself yet. :-)
> 
> I reported the issue "Fix signal handler"
> (http://synopsis.fresco.org/issues/bug132) as I've filed it for a few
> other open source projects.

Yes, noticed. Thanks.

> But I do not want to fiddle with (low-level) source code before the open
> design issues for AST, ASG, symbol table, overload resolution, template
> processing and the like will be resolved.

Now that's quite a list. How do these issues relate to each other ? Why
is any work you'd possibly use on the C++ frontend dependent on questions
relating to AST/ASG nomenclature ?
And, how do you think template processing will be 'resolved' ? By magic ?

I don't think your approach is very practical. If we all did that nothing
would ever happen.
(Yes, I did notice you like a straight top-down approach.)

Regards,
		Stefan

-- 

      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...