Re: Re: software design clarification

> Now that's quite a list. How do these issues relate to each other ?

Do we want to update the documentation together to show the relationships?
http://synopsis.fresco.org/docs/DevGuide/type-analysis.html


> Why is any work you'd possibly use on the C++ frontend dependent on
> questions relating to AST/ASG nomenclature ?
>   

I prefer the clear separation of interface layers, don't you?


> And, how do you think template processing will be 'resolved' ? By magic ?
>   

No, I am just looking for the places where missing features can be split 
into smaller pieces.


> I don't think your approach is very practical. If we all did that nothing
> would ever happen.
>   

Why? I insist on refactorings and redesigns that will hopefully prevent 
us from more work. I imagine to complete the internal class 
infrastructure by small building blocks.
We can decide together which brick should be added next. Would the 
software development approach 
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_pair_programming" be applicable in 
our use case?

Regards,
Markus