Re: Re: software design clarification

On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 20:07 +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > You seem to keep arguing for a design that needs to be done, but you fail
> > to tell us what it actually is that you want to design. Think "use-case driven
> > design", if that helps.
> >   
> 
> Example: How would you perform a search for called functions with 
> non-void return types in the source files?

Look for Encoding class in source and Koening lookup.

The problem is, a function name is valid if it can not be confuse with
another name in another class and the context where you find it.

And the question is a joke if you consider that we have template and
overriding.