Re: Re: software design clarification

Markus Elfring wrote:
> 
>> Sure, if possible. I'm not quite sure about 'similar way', as both
>> languages have their own idiosyncrasies. I'd prefer a pythonic
>> interface in Python, rather than a straight translation from C++, say.
>>   
> 
> Are the scripting interfaces that can automatically be provided by SWIG
> pythonic?

I think you are missing the point. The question is not whether the bindings
can be generated automatically, but whether the generated API is what we
want. I think that boost.python is a much better fit than swig, FWIW.

Regards,
		Stefan

-- 

      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...