Re: [Opencxx-users] Re: The Array type

Grzegorz Jakacki wrote:

> Just to clarify: I have never rejected it and this is still open. I 
> tried to understand how Synopsis uses qmtest, but for misc. reasons I 
> failed. Stefan, if you have running examples that do qmtesting of 
> OpenC++, I would love to have a look. And generally, could you post 
> instructions how to check out your OpenC++ "branch" from Synopsis repo?

There are no OpenC++ tests checked in yet, I hope to check in something
useful this week. I did write some code to test the Buffer, Lexer, Parser,
and Encoding classes, though.

As to the code in general, just download a Synopsis snapshot from
http://synopsis.fresco.org/download/, the OpenC++ stuff is in
Synopsis/Parsers/Cxx (may be a bit unstable these days as I'm heavily
refactoring / rewriting).

> And last but not least: I think that the first thing that should be 
> established if we get down to increasing coverage is a mechanism to 
> measure line coverage conveniently (using e.g. gcov). Otherwise speaking 
> about increasing coverage is a little bit hand waving. If any of you 
> guys want to take it, please do, I will be busy with other things at 
> least till the end of August (samples, 2.8, merging to main, docs).

I don't quite agree. There are currently no unit tests, so 'coverage'
could just mean to write them starting with the most central classes
first (Buffer, Lexer, PTree classes, Encoding, Environment, Parser).

Regards,
		Stefan