Re: Re: software design clarification

On 5/14/07, Markus Elfring <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I know :-)
> >
> > * high priority: ignore non-relevant, distracting posts
>
> Why do you see my approaches for clarification of useable design choices
> as irrelevant contributions?

I read your posts, I understand every word but I don't see how it is
connected\related\relevant to Synopsis. The half-phrase your spread
here and there, don't help anyone.

>
>
> > * concentrate the attention on next generation of the parser :-)))
> >
>
> Will this concentration result in additions to any class library if
> acceptable designs are unclear?

This is exactly what I am talking - I don't understand what you are
talking about.


-- 
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/