Re: class library design selection

"Eric M. Hopper" <[email protected]> Mon, 21 May 2007 09:16:52 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.documentation.synopsis
Organization Omnifarious Software
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--===============0242294669==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-qLBx/lKy7AWboKBADYXJ"


--=-qLBx/lKy7AWboKBADYXJ
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 22:00 +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Both are C++ front end and are tools used by/for Synopsis.
> > No infrastructure there.
> >  =20
>=20
> How much can we learn from the differences in these approaches about=20
> required classes for higher levels on language processing?

If people took the time to learn absolutely everything about a coding
project before they started it, they would never get done.  Do you have
a useful patch to contribute that moves the Synopsis project forward,
are you simply intended to be a source of molasses so no useful tool is
ever produced?

How many of the projects you've been involved with have suffered from
this condition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analysis_paralysis

> Can anything be reused from the CppInfo API for Synopsis' purposes?
> http://g4re.sourceforge.net/GXL/

Probably almost nothing as it does not appear you can reproduce the
original C++ from the XML.

It might be interesting to generate this as a document output format at
some point in the far future, after Synopsis is fairly mature, but it
seems to me that someone is going to come along and make gcc output this
anyway.

> I do not see that they have got much in common from the OpenC++ sources=20
> so far. Why are other designs not "on track"?

Perhaps you should go and ask them and give them a lot of links to all
kinds of random seemingly related projects and ask them why they aren't
doing it that way?

> > Some ideas can be borrow from there
> > http://www.mono-project.com/ECMA
>=20
> How much do you want to add to the Synopsis class library from this=20
> specification?

Probably about as much as someone would want to add from this
specification:

http://www.openxmldeveloper.org/

Regards,
--=20
The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they
be properly armed.  -- Alexander Hamilton
-- Eric Hopper ([email protected]  http://www.omnifarious.org/~hopper)=
 --

--=-qLBx/lKy7AWboKBADYXJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBGUcX0jtsvlOwvazYRAoovAKDL9B6ZrD96RoUOaMWWOYEs/t2iRwCeNAhO
lkAwO/7DqnAi5SY5miyiU8k=
=bApf
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----

--=-qLBx/lKy7AWboKBADYXJ--

--===============0242294669==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Synopsis-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fresco.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/synopsis-devel

--===============0242294669==--