Re: RE: Swixml and SAX, Jelly - Final Word ?
Kevin Duffey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.embedded.carlsbad-cubes |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Fair enough. I am happy to help with the plugin engine area if you choose to go that route, whether you use my genpluginengine, or you want something a little simpler yet similar. I'll keep watch on the emails, let me know when you want to go that route, or Warner can let me know on our list. --- Wolf Paulus <[email protected]> wrote: > If I could, I would like to pause the Sax, Pull, > etc. discussion for a > while. I think everyone interested has had a chance > to voice an > opinion. > Everyone has his reasons for using Swixml (or any > other XUL library) > and I really do welcome all your suggestions and > concerns. > > That said, only a few experienced GUI developers > have created > reasonably sized Java application using Swixml, some > of them are listed > in the Acknowledgment on the Swixml.org Web site and > obviously, > opinions from those member are considered a little > more ;-) > > If the XML descriptor you are using is one MB or > more - yours truly > hadn't you in mind when creating Swixml. > If you deploy on a platform where Swixml / Swing is > terribly slow - > xmlpull won't help you much and you are better of > replacing Swing > altogether (with Thinlet for instance). > However, like I have said before, I'm working in the > embedded space and > therefore ALWAYS consider resource limitations. > > The next Swixml update will have the long awaited > and much improve > layout support. > Following that, a re-factoring of parser and engine > will enable SWT. > (Again - Swixml is going to support SWT) > Extending Swixml (call it plug-in architecture if > you'd like) is going > to enable the pre-fill Comboboxes and Tables with > data through the XML > descriptor. > > That's what's in the pipeline and the xml-pull and > sax discussion are > probably not going to change this. > I'm very sorry if you find that disappointing. > However, Swixml is > carefully being developed over more than a year now > and even after > moving the source into a CVS things are probably not > going to change > all that much. (Again - Swixml is going to be moved > into a CVS - I'm > just not to sure about java.net anymore). > > Wolf Paulus > > C a r l s b a d C u b e s > mailto:[email protected] > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: > This message is intended only for the use of the > individual or entity > to which it is addressed, and may contain > information that is > privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure > under applicable > law. > If you are not the intended recipient, please > contact the sender by > reply email and destroy all copies of the original > message. > > > _______________________________________________ > Forum mailing list > [email protected] > http://carlsbadcubes.com/mailman/listinfo/forum_carlsbadcubes.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003 http://search.yahoo.com/top2003