Re: Swixml 1.1, License, etc.
Wolf Paulus <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.embedded.carlsbad-cubes |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Kate, For the reasons mentioned here in this forum, I would probably rather go with the LGPL, if the project started today. Changing the license type now however might put some developers into a difficult position - not all companies allow the use of LGPL licensed software - and while I don't know about a specific case, I didn't want the early adaptors to suffer. Moreover, I would rather move-on doing more interesting things like swixml2.0, franklin, etc. than fighting a license war on the forum ;-) Wolf Paulus C a r l s b a d C u b e s mailto:[email protected] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. On Mar 1, 2004, at 8:36 AM, kate rhodes wrote: > out of curiosity, why did you choose to stick with the same license? > > -Kate > > _______________________________________________ > Forum mailing list > [email protected] > http://carlsbadcubes.com/mailman/listinfo/forum_carlsbadcubes.com