Re: planning for change

Wolf Paulus <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.embedded.carlsbad-cubes
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Good idea and definitely required as soon as we break existing Swixml 
XUL descriptors.

	Wolf Paulus

C a r l s b a d   C u b e s
mailto:[email protected]

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity 
to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is 
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by 
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
On Mar 11, 2004, at 10:29 AM, kate rhodes wrote:

> the thought just struck me that sooner or later something is going to 
> change dramatically in swixml
>
> should we not consider the addition of a swixml version element to the 
> XML now so that down the road all we'll have to do is increment it in 
> our xml so that the processor knows it can use whatever new things 
> we've invented by that point?
>
> just a passing thought.
>
> -Kate
>
> _______________________________________________
> Forum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://carlsbadcubes.com/mailman/listinfo/forum_carlsbadcubes.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.