Re: Peter still in misery (was: Jan doesn't want Peter to know (was: Peter wants

[pointless ad hominem snipped]
 
> Flagrant breach of copyright?  That Computerworld article was 
posted 
> not by Roger, not by Jan, not by Jay but by one of the thousands of 
> normal members of the group.

I seem to have lost the link here.  Breach of copyright is breach of 
copyright - no matter who commits it.  The only reason Jay is in any 
way relevant is that he's the moderator.  By excluding me he has 
shown that he is actively managing the resource, and by tolerating 
the assistance of piracy and breache sof copyright he is 
demonstrating the attitude of Herculeans to both activities.

> But is it actionable?  Certainly not.  Computerworld, like most 
> online periodicals, allows for its articles to be e-mailed.

Onward transmission and re-publication are two very different things. 
I suggest consulting a lawyer.

From the foot of the home page (http://www.computerworld.com):

Copyright © 2002 Computerworld Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction 
in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written 
permission of Computerworld Inc. is prohibited. Computerworld and 
Computerworld.com and the respective logos are trademarks of 
International Data Group Inc




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/JjlUgA/vN2EAA/kG8FAA/dpFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
hercules-advocacy-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/