Re: Re: Peter still in misery (was: Jan doesn't want Peter to know (was: Peter wants

On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 09:04:54AM -0500, Peter D. Ward wrote:
> Jay Maynard wrote:
> > I would love nothing more than to see a SHARE requirement for a hobbyist
> > license, if for no other reason than IBM would have to take the idea
> > seriously enough to formulate a formal answer.
> Does IBM have to provide a response to the previous WAVV requirement
> vote?

Good question. I don't know how seriously they take WAVV; I would hope they
would take them as seriously as they do SHARE, but their historical
treatment of VM and VSE argues otherwise.

In any event, two requirements from two groups are better than one.

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/JjlUgA/vN2EAA/kG8FAA/dpFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
hercules-advocacy-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/