Re: Has IBM changed its licenses?

"halfmeg <[email protected]>" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.advocacy
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> Peter D. Ward wrote:
> > "halfmeg " wrote:
> >  Gee Whiz, Peter, do you always think in terms of PWD offerings.
> >  Does your product stop functioning without a PWD license?  What
> > about non PWD license holders?
> 
> Uh, IBM's license has no bearing on those not taking a license
> through IBM.  At present PWD is the only Flex-ES-based offering of
> IBM.  Should I be concerned about what IBM's licenses say when they
> are not a party to the transaction?

Ok, so now you state IBM's license has no bearing on non-licensees.  
This is something IBM might disagree with, if it involves their IP.

"PWD is the only FLEX-ES-based offering of IBM", who sells FLEX to 
production end users?

FUNSOFT's web site implies that you are concerned with IBM licenses 
to which you are not a party. "All license terms for all operating 
systems and applications must be adhered to strictly."

> > If additional license terms don't mean money terms, then the "free
> > license" should be available to all who "qualify" based on their
> > project info and could run on whatever system they wish, not just
> > a FLEX PWD offering.

> Phil, the "additional terms" are merely additional license terms
> associated with only certain elements of the PWD package as opposed
> to those terms applying to all items in the package, and they are
> made available for you to consider when licensing the AD-CD's.
> Those terms are discussed and linked to as follows:
><snip>
> may contain additional terms for that particular product:
> http://etpgw02.dfw.ibm.com/MVSDS/'HTTPD2.ZOS13LPS.html' . Users of
> the ADCD are required to read and abide by these additional terms.  
><snip>

The link below is not additional for specific products, it is for 
usage of the ADCD and contains requirements to obtain (purchase or 
lease) an IBM authorized system from the PartnerWorld for Developer 
(PWD) Program or the FLEX-ES emulator from a PWD qualified IBM 
Business Partner.  This doesn't exactly seem like a free loan license.

http://etpgw02.dfw.ibm.com/MVSDS/'HTTPD2.liadcd.html'

> > If we have a z/900 on which we wish to carve out
> > an LPAR and a few MIPS to develop with, the PWD license prohibits
> > that usage.
> > Phil - thinking the whole mess stinks
 
> The z/900 offered through the program is cheaper than the z/900
> offerred commercially.  If you already have a machine that they are
> interested in you developing upon, perhaps they might make
> an exception.  Ask them.

Don't think they really want folks to develop without paying 
the "participation fee".  Especially when they are cutting out those 
who have already paid once.  "Please note: members with older P390, 
R390, or Integrated Server (3006) development systems are not 
eligible to receive a copy of the z/OS 1.4 ADCD."

Phil - It still stinks and this last part may violate an earlier 
agreement with their PWD licensees




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/LIgTpC/vN2EAA/xGHJAA/dpFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
hercules-advocacy-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.