QUESTION: How many of you are still using Windows 9x (Win98 or WinMe)??

"Fish" <fish-6N/[email protected]> Sun, 02 Apr 2006 03:35:22 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.mvs,gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.advocacy,gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.general,gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.vm,gmane.comp.emulators.turnkey-mvs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'm curious as to how many Hercules users are still using Windows 9x.

If you are please reply.

If you are NOT then please DON'T reply. (We don't need a jillion
replies!)

The only reason I'm asking is to get a feel for whether or not we can
(or how SOON we can) drop support for Windows 9x.

To be completely honest continuing to support Win9x is getting to be
a pain (and in fact I suspect some non-Win9x-compatible changes may
have already accidentally wiggled their way into the code base[1]) so
I was wondering if maybe we shouldn't just drop support for it
altogether.

This is just a feeler/inquiry! I'm *not* suggesting that we are (I
am) are actually planning to do so!

I'm only trying to get a *feel* for whether or not such *could*
*MAYBE* be done at some point in the future.

Sooo... anyone out there still using that insecure piece-of-crap
o/s?? :)

Thanks. :)

- -- 
"Fish" (David B. Trout) - fish(at)infidels.org
Fight Spam! Join CAUCE! <http://www.cauce.org/>
(Any HTML email received will be deleted unread)
PGP key fingerprints:
DH/DSS: 9F9B BAB0 BA7F C458 1A89  FE26 48F5 D7F4 C4EE 3E2A
RSA:    6B37 7110 7201 9917 9B0D  99E3 55DB 5D58 FADE 4A52

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBRC+o6Ej11/TE7j4qEQIxIwCg0HsdUXkY/6pS730/rP/uoDXJ9qwAn285
/0/Y0dqPXjKkNfrTfMbESVZb
=5E+m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/H390-MVS/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/