QUESTION: How many of you are still using Windows 9x (Win98 or WinMe)??
"Fish" <fish-6N/[email protected]> Sun, 02 Apr 2006 03:35:22 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.mvs,gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.advocacy,gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.general,gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.vm,gmane.comp.emulators.turnkey-mvs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I'm curious as to how many Hercules users are still using Windows 9x.
If you are please reply.
If you are NOT then please DON'T reply. (We don't need a jillion
replies!)
The only reason I'm asking is to get a feel for whether or not we can
(or how SOON we can) drop support for Windows 9x.
To be completely honest continuing to support Win9x is getting to be
a pain (and in fact I suspect some non-Win9x-compatible changes may
have already accidentally wiggled their way into the code base[1]) so
I was wondering if maybe we shouldn't just drop support for it
altogether.
This is just a feeler/inquiry! I'm *not* suggesting that we are (I
am) are actually planning to do so!
I'm only trying to get a *feel* for whether or not such *could*
*MAYBE* be done at some point in the future.
Sooo... anyone out there still using that insecure piece-of-crap
o/s?? :)
Thanks. :)
- --
"Fish" (David B. Trout) - fish(at)infidels.org
Fight Spam! Join CAUCE! <http://www.cauce.org/>
(Any HTML email received will be deleted unread)
PGP key fingerprints:
DH/DSS: 9F9B BAB0 BA7F C458 1A89 FE26 48F5 D7F4 C4EE 3E2A
RSA: 6B37 7110 7201 9917 9B0D 99E3 55DB 5D58 FADE 4A52
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4
iQA/AwUBRC+o6Ej11/TE7j4qEQIxIwCg0HsdUXkY/6pS730/rP/uoDXJ9qwAn285
/0/Y0dqPXjKkNfrTfMbESVZb
=5E+m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/H390-MVS/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/