[hercules-390] Re: I'm downloading z/VM from IBM...
"idc3009i" <idc3009i-OY9L03cMKN8G2Il/[email protected]> Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:11:35 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.emulators.hercules390.advocacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- In [email protected], Jay Maynard <jmaynard@...> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 06:38:45AM -0500, Jay Maynard wrote: > [about the z/VM trial edition:] > > FWIW, there's an interesting bit in the license...but that belongs on > > hercules-advocacy, not here. > > The license says, in part: > > z/VM Version 5 Release 3 Evaluation Edition operates on the IBM System > z10 Enterprise Class (z10 EC). The Program requires hardware that > implements the IBM 64-bit z/Architecture in order to execute properly > and therefore You are not authorized to install or use this Program on > any machine that does not properly implement 64-bit z/Architecture. > > Note that it does not say that "you must run this Program only on a z10 EC". > IBM is very, very good at making licenses say exactly what they want them to > mean. To me, this means that the evaluation edition may be run on Hercules > as long as Hercules properly implements the 64-bit z/Architecture. I think the reality of this is that it is of limited use. Having read through the terms a little more closely than before, there are restrictions which would make it difficult to consider the use of this trial software by any of us legal under the terms of the license, or at least not for very long. Aside from the fact that this will not install under Hercules without the assistance of another z/Architecture version of VM, there are several parts of the license which are of concern. <quote> You may 1) use the Program only for internal evaluation, testing, or demonstration purposes, on a trial or "try-and-buy" basis </quote> This makes it clear that this is what it says; a trial product, not a hobbyist's license. <quote> The evaluation period begins when You agree to the terms of this Agreement and ends 1) as of the duration or date specified in the License Information, or 2) when the Program automatically disables itself. There is no charge for the use of the Program for the duration of the evaluation period. Unless IBM specifies in the License Information that You may retain the Program, You will destroy the Program and all copies made of it within ten days of the end of the evaluation period. </quote> and <quote> The evaluation period begins on the date that You agree to the terms of this Agreement and ends after 90 days. </quote> 90 days isn't a huge amount of time, and, at the end of that period, you would have to destroy any copy of the product you may have. It ain't really a keeper. As you rightly point out, there is also the matter of where it can be run. The part that states "The Program requires hardware that implements the IBM 64-bit z/Architecture in order to execute properly and therefore You are not authorized to install or use this Program on any machine that does not properly implement 64-bit z/Architecture" could be interpretted as "you can run this on Hercules as long as it implements 64-bit z/Architecture properly", but who determines that? IBM may take that to mean that it can be run on any machine that it has determined runs 64-bit z/Architecture properly, which would mean that Hercules would have had to have passed IBM's architectural tests to qualify, and we all know that is not going to happen. There's also the matter of the word "hardware" to consider. Hercules definitely is not a piece of hardware but a piece of software running on totally incompatible hardware. True, it could be argued that even IBM's hardware implementation is handled by several layers of microcode and as such is also a software solution, but that's probably splitting the hair a little too fine. I did think to download and hang onto it just to say I'd got it even if Hercules would not install it due to the console issue, but even that's not really permitted by the license. It kind of reminded me of that time Madonna put out an MP3 file on the file sharing networks proporting to be of some new release but it just turned out to be her swearing and cursing about how the people who downloaded it should go out and buy it instead of stealing. There wound up being a whole load of fans who went out trying to download that file just so they could say they'd got it. Ah, well!